Yesterday America and the world had to listed to the U.S. President, once again, give a long winded speech. This is nothing new. It followed an equally appalling speech he gave at the National Prayer Breakfast last week. Also again we had to listen to the U.S. President pander to muslims, again nothing new. Over and over again he told us and the world that the "terrorists" are not muslims, they don't represent islam. He pointed out that there are many "different" groups involved in terror and it is not just one group or region (he did not mention these "other" groups.) The fact that he, and his groupies in the State Department (Jen Psaki and Marie Harf), his spokeskid Josh Ernest and the rest of his warped far left wing administration can not and will not identify the terrorists as islamic. They all go to great pains never to say islamic terrorist, this is POLICY in his administration. Thank God we had no problem identifying the enemies in World War II.
We are constantly told that it is just a tiny, little, small, miniscule, very few number of muslims that are terrorists. We are also told that there are 1.6 billion muslims in the world, the overwhelming, vast majority are so-called "peaceful or moderate muslims." So how many are really "peaceful" muslims?
We could look at a poll of muslims living in muslim countries. If you look at this poll from 2006;
It appears from these polls that outside the U.S. the number of "peaceful muslims" is in the 60% to 70% range, in some countries less. So for ease we will set the number of violent muslims at 30%, that is about 180 million muslims that support, in one way or another, the violent tactics of the terrorists. Perhaps 30% is considered a "tiny minority" by the U.S. President, but it seems like a large number to me. The polls also show that muslims living in the U.S.A. are far less likely to agree with terrorist tactics, about 5% seems to be the average.
You will find that muslims in muslim countries seem to support terrorist tactics on a more than "tiny" scale. You will also see that Jordanians' top the lists of radicals in almost every poll. Remember this when you see the media and politicians praise them for attacking isis. Also remember that they (Jordan) only got all revved up when isis fried one of their pilots.
Here is another page to look over;
Far too much for me to go into on this page, but there are polls from all over the world.
Everyone in the world knows that islam is spawning these serial murderers, but for some bizarre reason people in high places refuse to name them as such. It's not a secret who the terrorists are or what religion they represent, but like Göbbels in Hitler's Nazi Germany the media and especially the left-wing U.S. president think they can fool the masses with propaganda. They do everything in their power to placate and pander to the muslims, if it were not so dangerous it would be comical. It is made worse by the fact that the left-wing media in the U.S. just parrots the administration line without much investigation.
But it's not comical, it's not a sketch on Saturday Night Live or Monty Python when that cool-aid drinking, air-head, silly, stupid Harf woman at the State Dept (a dear departed friend of mine would just call her a goofy broad) says the biggest problem is that isis fighters don't have jobs!! Perhaps she and the U.S. President would like to offer them food stamps or maybe an unemployment check, we can even throw in free health care, all provided by the U.S. tax payer. Maybe we could pass another huge spending bill through Congress for some "shovel ready jobs" like he did some years ago. Well from what I have seen on the news, isis has created its own shovel ready jobs in abundance.
It would be nice if just once one of the sycophants in the media would ask this man (the President) or his groupies if they consider any of the following groups to be islamic;
Abdallah Azzam Brigades
Abu Nidal Organization
Abu Sayyaf Group
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade
Army of Islam
Basque Fatherland and Liberty (left-wing communist)
Communist Party of Philippines/New People's Army (left-wing communist)
Continuity Irish Republican Army (not islamic)
Hizballah Indian Mujahedeen
Islamic Jihad Union
Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan
Jama'atu Ansarul Muslimina Fi Biladis-Sudan
Jemaah Ansharut Tauhid
Kahane Chai (not islamic)
Kurdistan Workers' Party (Left-wing Marxist-Leninist)
Lashkar i Jhangvi
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (Not islamic)
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group
National Liberation Army (Left-wing Marxist-Leninist)
Palestine Islamic Jihad - Shaqaqi Faction
Palestine Liberation Front - Abu Abbas Faction
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula
Al-Qa'ida in Iraq
Al-Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb
Real IRA (not islamic)
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Left-wing Marxist-Leninist)
Revolutionary Organization 17 November (Radical leftist)
Revolutionary People's Liberation Party/Front (Left-wing Marxist-Leninist)
Revolutionary Struggle (Radical leftist)
Shining Path (left-wing Communist)
Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan
United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (not islamic)
The above is the official U.S. State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, it can be found here;
I guess the U.S. President is right, isis (or as he and his administration calls them isil) is not islamic, and according to the U.S. State Dept. they are not even a terrorist organization as they are not on the list. Could one of you so-called reporters ask little Josh or that other cool-aid drinking air-head Psaki why isis is not on the list?
Perhaps a good question to ask them is this, if the terrorists are not islamic, why are the prisoners at Gitmo (Camp Justice) given a strict muslim diet, a prayer rug and a koran? Non muslims, as we are told these people are, would not need such items. But it seems that someone in the government believes that they are indeed muslims.
You will take note that the list above is overwhelmingly islamic/muslim, second place goes to the left-wing Communist/Marxist groups, one would also note that there is no doubt our left-wing President is aware of this list. Here is another list found on the State Department website.
State Sponsors of Terrorism
The original can be found here;
Cuba, according to the State Department, is the longest standing State Sponsor of Terrorism, yet our left-wing President has, without the approval of Congress, began the normalization of diplomatic relations with this country. Why would the President of the United States reward a designated State Sponsor of Terrorism with diplomatic relations with America?
He (the President) is negotiating with Iran in secret (the negotiations are not a secret, but the terms are) regarding their (Irans') nuclear weapons program. There have also been several people in the media who have reported that it is the desire of the American President to team up with Iran to fight isis. It is no secret that the leaders of Iran have said their goal is to wipe Israel off the map. Is Iran a member of the UN? Well yes it is, by the way their formal name is The Islamic Republic of Iran. (I wonder if they are muslims?)
One wonders what would happen if another country, lets say Israel, would say that it was there desire to wipe Iran off the map. I suspect that the UN would have an emergency meeting and would take all measures against Israel for making a terrorist threat against a member state. But no such meeting has ever taken place in the UN regarding the terrorist threats made by Iran against Israel. As Hitler warned the world of his intentions, Iran is doing the same, but nobody is listening. You would think a man, with ears the size of satellite dishes (our President), could hear. The last time the world refused to listen to a monster, 6 million Jews were murdered, 6 million others were murdered alongside them and another 40 million people died around the world. Why would an American President negotiate with a State Sponsor of Terrorism? A nation that wishes to commit genocide against Israel? (Of course it won't stop with Israel.) Would he have negotiated with Hitler?
There are only two other State Sponsors of Terrorism left on the list to discuss. Syria being one. What does the American President want to do, he wants to supply the "moderate" muslims in Syria weapons and training to fight isis. Who are the "moderate" muslims in Syria? Syria's leader is a mass murderer, the country has been in a civil war for years, he is fighting against muslim terrorists like isis. So our President thinks the best decision is to send more weapons into Syria. I hate to tell him, the "moderate" muslim who John McCain knows in Syria left the country to sell used camels in Jordan.
Now how about Sudan, bingo, I finally found a terrorist state our left-wing President is not trying to normalize relations with, or allow to obtain nuclear weapons or even supply directly with more weapons. Perhaps he has not heard of Sudan, please nobody tell him about them or he will do something else absurd.
So what can we conclude from this? First, the 40 islamic terrorist groups listed above are not considered islamic by the U.S. President. Second, the U.S. President is engaging in some kind of diplomatic talks at some level with three of four State Sponsors of Terrorism. Third, the left-wing U.S. media will not challenge the U.S. President or any of his groupies in the various departments. Fourth, the U.S. is not leading in the fight against islamic terror, because there is no such thing. Sixth, isis it seems will be allowed to grow, because that Harf woman said "we can't kill them all, nor should we try."
Why our President takes these radical positions is beyond reason. Is it because his father was a muslim and also a Communist? Is it because as a young boy he was raised in a muslim country (Indonesia), where he claimed (while he was a U.S. senator) he heard the most beautiful sound in the world, the muslim call to prayer? Is it because he was mentored by left-wing Communists like Frank Marshall Davis and Saul Alinski? Maybe the domestic terrorist Bill Ayres, his associate in Chicago, or Jeremiah Wright, his radical, racist minister of almost 20 years. To be sure his views were shaped by these people. Keep in mind, your views are shaped by your upbringing and the people that you were raised by and mentored by. The President is no different, his views were shaped the same way. However, it is interesting that his views were shaped by muslims, leftists and communists and even terrorists (Bill Ayres and Bernadine Dhoran of the Weather Underground) You will note that muslims, leftists and Communists top the State Department list of terrorist organizations.
Perhaps his left-wing views allow him to think that other Communists, like the Cuban dictator Castro, can be trusted. He once said that he admired what the Chinese (another Communist nation) were doing when they built the Olympic stadiums in Beijing. He said they can get things done, he was trying to motivate the Congress to pass an enormous spending bill. It was in reality little more than a one trillion dollar slush fund for his leftist friends, donors and the unions. But what he did not tell the public is that the Chinese could build those stadiums in record time because they had no opposition from land owners. Because Chinese can not own land, the state assigns where you can live and can take it away to build a stadium at any time. I can see why a man like him would admire such unbridled power.
It is thought that isis is comprised of about 50,000 men, a small army on the world stage, but if they are not stopped hard they will soon be a 5,000,000 man army that will murder their way across the world. There is only one way to defeat isis, kill them all, every last one of them. We should join with isis in their goal. They have said they wish to be martyrs, and we should do everything in our power to make their wishes come true.
This President, up to this point, will not do what it will take to stop isis. The next President will have a larger problem on his hands because of his failures. Also because of the failure of that man in Washington, thousands, maybe tens of thousands more people will die.
Compare how different Sir Winston Churchill viewed islam to how the U.S. President views islam;
Sept. 15, 2012 MaritimeQuest Daily Event.
One of the goals of the next President must be to restore the American position in the world. He must create an atmosphere where our Allies trust us and our enemies fear us. Currently neither is true.
© 2015 Michael W. Pocock
Later in the day on Feb. 19, 2015:
Today the President made another speech in which he again stressed that islam is not the problem. He spoke ad nauseam about how we must not blame islam for the terror problem. He again did all he could to protect this religion. There is no need for further comment about today's speech as it is more of the same far left, blame America tripe he has said before. It is enough to say it is exactly what you would expect from a far-left wing individual. Using his own logic, and his own words, he, Obama, is THE MOST irresponsible and THE MOST unpatriotic President in U.S. history. (During his first campaign he said President George W. Bush spent 4 trillion dollars on his own and that that was irresponsible and unpatriotic. Obama has spent twice that amount, in fact by the time he leaves office he will have spent more money than all the previous combined.)
Now maybe the most significant development of the day. CENTCOM announced that there will be a major military operation in Apr. or May to retake Mosul, Iraq. Let me put this another way, hey isis please get ready, move extra men and arms into the Mosul area and kill everyone you can in a hurry because in two or three months we are coming in. I would not want to be an Iraqi in Mosul after today because my life would not be worth a penny.
There could be reasons they would make such an announcement, and I hope this is some kind of subterfuge, but I have little confidence that this is the case. In World War II the Allies went to great effort to set up intelligence networks for intercepting enemy signals. The enemy did the same, but now the U.S. just goes on TV and tells the enemy what we are doing. And even worse the President has made a habit of telling the enemy of what he will not do as well. How much more insane can this administration get? If a soldier gave the enemy this information he would be executed as a traitor, would he not?
And last of all, today it was revealed that former New York City Mayor Rudi Guiliani said that he does not believe that the President loves America. Someone at the State Department however later confirmed that the President does love America. How amazing that the State Department felt in necessary to make that statement. Should it not be a given that a U.S. President actually loves his country. I guess someone at State decided that there was enough evidence to cause people to have doubts. (Keep in mind, Otto von Bismarck said; "Never believe anything until it has been officially denied."